This is my first piece on Copyright; this is more of an introduction to what my take is on the history of it. The subject itself is too deep to simply present all the facts and all the information, but ultimately I hope to present a reasoned opinion on it as I write more on the subject.
First and foremost I wish to make it clear that these are my own simple thoughts on the issues of copyright theft. I do not condone piracy nor do I condone a lifetime of servitude to all who are slaves to a contract between an owner of copyright and a provider of works to the copyright owner.
In the beginning.
Music was something you had to go to. It couldn’t be bought, it couldn’t be switched on or off, you had to go to the hall when the orchestra visited and pay the price for admission. Some hung outside quietly catching snippets of the performance.
Recorded music changed all. With the invention of the gramophone it became possible to place a recording of the music on a storage medium, that storage medium being a humble Wax disc not too dissimilar from a vinyl LP. Few possessed the technology to do this and those few started a business of recording performances pressing them to wax discs and selling them to the public so that they too could enjoy a musical experience even if they could not afford the price of a ticket to the concert.
An Idea refined.
In order to create an incentive to musicians a slice of the sales of music was offered, it was not much but that was negotiable to an extent (though that extent was still around %2-4). The greater the sale of the music, the more likely that artist was to produce more work. The extra funds earned from the sale of music by the recorded sound companies was re-invested in technology and finding new talent in order to increase sales and deliver more of what people wanted to hear.
The business model wasn’t the only thing that was refined, technology was refined too. Recording quality had improved dramatically, professional quality Mic’s and magnetic tape brought multi-track recording to the play. The early benefits can be heard on great music from artists like Ray Charles (Night and Day). The concept of home tape recording brought with it the ability for the home listener to compile his/her own recordings or make a mix tape that they could pass to a friend. The humble audio cassette became the first anti-piracy target of the music industry.
But with thanks to bands like Metallica, bootleg recordings of concerts were encouraged in order to help the band’s sound permeate the masses.
The industry progressed from wax to harder wearing Vinyl and the quality of the sound improved dramatically as a result.
When Harry met Sally….
Digital technology finally reached a point where it was possible to represent real music as binary code, etched into a fine sliver of metals coated in plastic, the compact disc revolutionized the distribution, and storage of music and came with a subsequent price hike. There is a debate as to whether CD’s are a ‘rip-off’ that’s a separate issue. An almost unholy marriage of the analogue (sound) to a digital medium
This marriage of digital technology and sound recordings is ultimately what has lead to an enormous decline in the profitability of the music industry. Initially it was thought that CD copying technology would be too expensive for anyone to own but those of us in technology knew that the potential data storage capability of the CD would be exploited cheaply soon enough it was only a matter of time.
The birth of CD piracy.
At first the CD writing machines were industrial machines that cost a huge sum of money to purchase and run. But the humble PC changed that. With increasing improvements in computer technology it became possible to mimic a lot of that process in software, resulting in the production of small compact CD writers that you could slot into your computer at home.
People now had the power to copy CD’s at will and many early adopters exploited that. Once it became possible to copy CD’s it was only a matter of time before the data itself could be lifted and stored.
Imaging – Separating the intangible from the physical.
Copying software became more advanced, and it became possible to store the draw data of a CD as a file on a computer that you could simply burn to another CD at will. It wasn’t long before it was realised that the next step was to lift the data of the disc verbatim and store it as an uncompressed Wave file on a computer’s hard disc. This took quite a large amount of storage (650mb-700mb) for a full 74-80 minutes of music.
MPEG Encoding Technology.
A number of new devices started to appear on the market promising a digital revolution that ended up not going anywhere. The Commodore CDTV was born and it had a capability to playback movies that were stored on CD. The race to develop a system of compression that could enable this to happen resulted in the production of the MPEG Codec. The first stab at taking a movie and its associated data and compressing it so that it could fit on a couple of CD’s.
Different levels of compression were used to deliver the finished product but the one that the music industry is interested in the most is a codec known as MPEG Layer 3 or more commonly MP3. Using this technology it became possible to turn a 60mb wave file into a compact 3-4mb with a little discernible quality loss. MP3 created a digital revolution for content distribution that culminated with the founding of Napster.
Napster
Regarded as the first and greatest music file sharing service; Napster would scan your computer for MP3’s and make them freely available for download to anyone else who used Napster. Napster re-defined the role of technology and media distribution. It challenged the old way of doing business by eliminating business from the equation.
The greatest issue created by Napster was simply one of money. Napster could deliver all the content available anywhere on anyone’s computer to anyone’s computer, with (in its hey-day) over 2 petabytes of data available on the network. The real problem this presented to business is simply that no money was changing hands so technically was it piracy?
The availability of music on this kind of scale was unheard of, you could get that old song by Pink Floyd faster than you could find it in a store and not even pay for it. Just type in the name and there it was.
The Music industry did whatever it could to bring Napster down without really understanding the technology behind it. In the process it ostracised many fans and instigated a swathe of lawsuits in an attempt to protect its property.
Interestingly enough Metallica lead the charge against Napster and instead of suing the individual who was distributing their music, they sued the organisation that the files were sourced from.
A dying era.
They say ‘No one missed the door to door ice sales guy when the fridge was invented.’ That may be the case, but that guys family probably missed the income.
Today I’m Listening to:
Play Dead by Bjork & David Arnold
Recent Comments